You Think EvilGuy is Hateful? Lookit Pervasive Female Bigotry Masquerading as Righteousness...

If you've been reading the EvilGuy series of stories, you'd come-off with the distinct impression that he's hateful. In fact, he lacks subtlety about it entirely. He is hateful.

Since I'm leaving soon, EvilGuy will go back into his box as I leave U.S. soil. As promised, he's going to keep himself locked-away in Japan and I'm happy to see him loosen his grip over my behavior. Unless, of course, I get crossed by an especially bitchy western chick while I'm over there- then the gloves are coming-off with a passion.

Oh, don't get me wrong- EvilGuy would never, ever act-out his violent urges- but the urges still exist in a less-intense form and it would be folly for me to deny that they do. I'll still abstain from having any sort of sympathy for the 'problems' of American women, too. They have far, far overplayed their 'victim-hood' card as far as I'm concerned. They've spent any and all sympathy they could ever evoke within me. If I ever see an American chick in danger, I'll refuse to lift a finger to help her. I'll smile inwardly, listen to her cries for help and keep-on walking. I'll save my compassion and understanding for women who deserve it.

Here's an illustration of how cynical I've gotten about American chicks: nowadays, whenever I hear about a woman in the U.S. being battered, the thought always crosses my mind about whether she lied about being beaten or if she tried to provoke the beating somehow. I know, that's a bad reaction for me to admit, but that's also what results when women cry 'wolf' too many times.

Up until now, you've plainly seen that EvilGuy is irrational, deluded, unreasonable and hateful. I abhor his violent urges. (Heh, but he is evil, though- no secret about that. I mean- look at his name!) But down below, I have a few quotes for you to read.

While you're reading, I'd like you to think about one question: whose hate has influenced more people over the years? That of EvilGuy (who has been in the public domain for a couple of months so far), or that of the following people (who have been spreading this stuff for a couple decades now)?

Perhaps you've seen these quotes elsewhere and consider them to be hackneyed and over-used? I don't care, I'm trying to make a point...

Robin Morgan, Former editor of MS magazine:

"I feel that 'man-hating' is an honorable and viable political act, that the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against the class that is oppressing them."

"...rape is the perfected act of male sexuality in a patriarchal culture-- it is the ultimate metaphor for domination, violence, subjugation, and possession."

"I haven't the faintest notion what possible revolutionary role white hetero-sexual men could fulfill, since they are the very embodiment of reactionary-vested-interest-power. But then, I have great difficulty examining what men in general could possibly do about all this. In addition to doing the shitwork that women have been doing for generations, possibly not exist? No, I really don't mean that. Yes, I really do."

"And let's put one lie to rest for all time: the lie that men are oppressed, too, by sexism--the lie that there can be such a thing as 'men's liberation groups.' Oppression is something that one group of people commits against another group specifically because of a 'threatening' characteristic shared by the latter group--skin color or sex or age, etc. The oppressors are indeed FUCKED UP by being masters (racism hurts whites, sexual stereotypes are harmful to men) but those masters are not OPPRESSED. Any master has the alternative of divesting himself of sexism or racism--the oppressed have no alternative--for they have no power--but to fight. In the long run, Women's Liberation will of course free men--but in the short run it's going to COST men a lot of privilege, which no one gives up willingly or easily. Sexism is NOT the fault of women--kill your fathers, not your mothers."

"I claim that rape exists any time sexual intercourse occurs when it has not been initiated by the woman, out of her own genuine affection and desire." -- "Theory and Practice: Pornography and Rape" in "Going to Far."

"The phallic malady is epidemic and systemic... each individual male in the patriarchy is aware of his relative power in the scheme of things.... He knows that his actions are supported by the twin pillars of the State of man - the brotherhood ritual of political exigency and the brotherhood ritual of a sexual thrill in dominance. As a devotee of Thanatos, he is one with the practitioner of sado-masochistic "play" between "consenting adults," as he is one with the rapist." -- "The Demon Lover."

Andrea Dworkin:

"Heterosexual intercourse is the pure, formalized expression of contempt for women's bodies."

"Rape is the primary heterosexual model for sexual relating.
Rape is the primary emblem of romantic love.
Rape is the means by which a woman is initiated into her womanhood as it is defined by men.
...
Rape, then, is the logical consequence of a system of definitions of what is normative. Rape is no excess, no aberration, no accident, no mistake--it embodies sexuality as the culture defines it." -- Andrea Dworkin "The Rape Atrocity and the Boy Next Door", Our Blood.

"...the prisons for women are our homes. We live under martial law. We live in places in which a rape culture exists. That is a women's home, where she lives. Men have to be sent to prison, to live in a culture that is as rapist as the normal home in North America. We live under what amounts to a military curfew. Enforced by rapists. And we say usually that we're free citizens in a free society. We lie. We lie, we lie everyday about it... We live in a police state where every man is deputized...
"In the United States, violence against women is a major pastime. It is a sport. It is an amusement. It is a mainstream cultural entertainment. And it is real. It is pervasive. It is epidemic. It saturates the society. It's very hard to make anyone notice it, because there is so much of it." -- "Terror, Torture and Resistance"

"The traditional flowers of courtship are the traditional flowers of the grave, delivered to the victim before the kill. The cadaver is dressed up and made up and laid down and ritually violated and consecrated to an eternity of being used."

"I want to see a man beaten to a bloody pulp with a high-heel shoved in his mouth, like an apple in the mouth of a pig." -- "Ice and Fire."

"Men renounce whatever they have in common with women so as to experience no commonality with women; and what is left... is one piece of flesh a few inches long, the penis. The penis is the man; the man is human; the penis signifies humanity."

"Men are rapists, batterers, plunderers, killers; these same men are religious prophets, poets, heroes, figures of romance, adventure, accomplishment, figures ennobled by tragedy and defeat. Men have claimed the earth, called it "Her." Men ruin Her. Men have airplanes, guns, bombs, poisonous gases, weapons so perverse and deadly that they defy any authentically human imagination." -- "Pornography: Men Possessing Women."

"On the Left, on the Right, in the Middle; Authors, statesmen, thieves; so-called humanists and self-declared fascists; the adventurous and the contemplative, in every realm of male expression and action, violence is experienced and articulated as love and freedom." -- "Pornography: Men Possessing Women."

Catherine MacKinnon:

"All sex, even consensual sex between a married couple, is an act of violence perpetrated against a woman."

"You grow up with your father holding you down and covering your mouth so another man can make a horrible searing pain between your legs."

"...the private (family) is a sphere of battery, marital rape and women's exploited labor."

"In a patriarchal society, all heterosexual intercourse is rape because women, as a group, are not strong enough to give meaningful consent." -- Quoted in "Professing Feminism: Cautionary Tales from the Strange World of Women's Studies."

Marilyn French, authored these statements through a fictional character in her book "The Women's Room", (the fictionalized character's statements are often suggested to be a convenient cover for the author's airing of her own personal opinions. The third and fourth statements are from different sources.):

"All men are rapists and that's all they are..."

"My feelings about men are the result of my experience. I have little sympathy for them. Like a Jew just released from Dachau, I watch the handsome young Nazi soldier fall writhing to the ground with a bullet in his stomach and I look briefly and walk on. I don't even need to shrug. I simply don't care. What he was, as a person, I mean, what his shames and yearnings were, simply don't matter."

"As long as some men use physical force to subjugate females, all men need not. The knowledge that some men do suffices to threaten all women. He can beat or kill the woman he claims to love; he can rape women...he can sexually molest his daughters... THE VAST MAJORITY OF MEN IN THE WORLD DO ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE." (Her emphasis.)

"The media treat male assaults on women like rape, beating, and murder of wives and female lovers, or male incest with children, as individual aberrations... obscuring the fact that all male violence toward women is part of a concerted campaign."

Susan Griffin:

"And in the spectrum of male behavior, rape, the perfect combination of sex and violence, is the penultimate [sic] act. Erotic pleasure cannot be separated from culture, and in our culture male eroticism is wedded to power." -- "Rape: The Politics of Consciousness."

"And if the professional rapist is to be separated from the average dominant heterosexual [male], it may be mainly a quantitative difference." -- "Rape: The All-American Crime."

Susan Brownmiller:

"[Rape] is nothing more or less than a conscious process of intimidation by which all men keep all women in a state of fear." -- "Against Our Will."

Sylvia Fraser:

"I was, in reality, bred by my parents as my father's concubine... What we take for granted as the stability of family life may well depend on the sexual slavery of our children. What's more, this is a cynical arrangement our institutions have colluded to conceal."

Sheila Jeffrys:

"When a woman reaches orgasm with a man she is only collaborating with the patriarchal system, eroticizing her own oppression..."

Suzanne Moore:

"The problems we are facing are not to do with the fact that women are becoming like men, or even that they are not womanly enough. The problem is that men are too much like men and must learn to be a little less so if any progress is to be made."

Germain Greer:

"Probably the only place where a man can feel really secure is in a maximum security prison, except for the imminent threat of release."

(In response to the question: "You [Greer] were once quoted as saying your idea of the ideal man is a woman with a dick. Are you still that way inclined?")
Dr Greer, (after denying that she said it): "I have a great deal of difficulty with the idea of the ideal man. As far as I'm concerned, men are the product of a damaged gene. They pretend to be normal but what they're doing sitting there with benign smiles on their faces is they're manufacturing sperm. They do it all the time. They never stop.
"I mean, we women are more reasonable. We pop one follicle every 28 days, whereas they are producing 400 million sperm for each ejaculation, most of which don't take place anywhere near an ovum. I don't know that the ecosphere can tolerate it." -- At a Hilton Hotel literary lunch, promoting her book "The Change-- Women, Aging and the Menopause."

"(Men are) freaks of nature... full of queer obsessions about fetishistic activities and fantasy goals." -- "The Whole Woman."

“...men bash women because they enjoy it; they torture women as they might torture an animal or pull the wings off flies.” -- "The Whole Woman."

"The man regards (woman) as a receptacle into which he has emptied his sperm, a kind of human spitoon." -- "The Female Eunuch."

Judith Levine:

"I feel what they feel: man-hating, that volatile admixture of pity, contempt, disgust, envy, alienation, fear, and rage at men. It is hatred not only for the anonymous man who makes sucking noises on the street, not only for the rapist or the judge who acquits him, but for what the Greeks called philo-aphilos, 'hate in love,' for the men women share their lives with--husbands, lovers, friends, fathers, brothers, sons, coworkers." -- "My Enemy, My love."

"There are no boundaries between affectionate sex and slavery in (the male) world. Distinctions between pleasure and danger are academic; the dirty-laundrylist of 'sex acts'...includes rape, foot binding, fellatio, intercourse, auto eroticism, incest, anal intercourse, use and production of pornography, cunnilingus, sexual harassment, and murder." -- commenting on a document from A Southern Women's Writing Collective: "Women Against Sex."

"Men's sexuality is mean and violent, and men so powerful that they can 'reach WITHIN women to fuck/construct us from the inside out.' Satan-like, men possess women, making their wicked fantasies and desires women's own. A woman who has sex with a man, therefore, does so against her will, 'even if she does not feel forced.'"

Statement made by A University of Maine Feminist Administrator:

"All men are good for is fucking, and running over with a truck." -- Quoted by Richard Dinsmore, who brought a successful civil suit against the University in the amount of $600,000. Richard had protested the quote; was dismissed thereafter on the grounds of harassment; and responded by bringing suit against the University in 1995.

Quotes documented by antifeminist author Daphne Patai:

"Men, as a group, tend to be abusive, either verbally, sexually or emotionally. There are always the exceptions, but they are few and far between (I am married to one of them). There are different levels of violence and abuse and individual men buy into this system by varying degrees. But the male power structure always remains intact." -- Message on FEMISA e-board, responding to a request for arguments that men are unnecessary for a child to grow into mature adulthood.

"Considering the nature and pervasiveness of men's violence, I would say that without question, children are better off being raised without the presence of men. Assaults on women and children are mostly perpetrated by men whom they are supposed to love and trust: fathers, brothers, uncles, grandfathers, step-fathers." -- Message on FEMISA e-board.

Rosie DiManno:

“Men are from another planet, sent here by spaceships to copulate with female earthlings and propagate the species—a task for which science has rendered them all but redundant. We need keep only a handful of donors on a sperm farm for that purpose, where they can subsist on pizza and beer and Playboy magazine.” -- "Toronto Star", January 11, 1999, page 31.

Catherine Comin, Vassar College. Assistant Dean of Students:

"Men who are unjustly accused of rape can sometimes gain from the experience."

Katha Pollitt:

"We live, I am trying to say, in an epidemic of male violence against women."

Valerie Solanas, author of "The Society for Cutting-Up Men Manifesto":

"The male is a biological accident: the y (male) gene is an incomplete x (female) gene, that is, has an incomplete set of chromosomes. In other words, the male is an incomplete female, a walking abortion, aborted at the gene stage. To be male is to be deficient, emotionally limited; maleness is a deficiency disease and males are emotional cripples."

"To call a man an animal is to flatter him; he's a machine, a walking dildo."

"Unable to empathize or feel affection or loyalty, being exclusively out for himself, the male has no sense of fair play; cowardly, needing constantly to pander to the female to win her approval, that he is helpless without, always on edge lest his animalism, his maleness be discovered, always needing to cover up, he must lie constantly; being empty, he has no honor or integrity--he doesn't know what those words mean. The male, in short, is treacherous, and the only appropriate attitude in a male "society" is cynicism and distrust."

"The male likes death--it excites him sexually and, already dead inside, he wants to die... The male is, by his very nature, a leech, an emotional parasite and, therefore, not ethically entitled to live, as no one has the right to live at someone else's expense."

(Males should) “...go off to the nearest friendly suicide center where they will be quickly and painlessly gassed to death.”

Jilly Cooper, follower of Valerie Solanas:

"The male is a domestic animal which, if treated with firmness...can be trained to do most things."

Emma Magazine (A German womens' publication):

“'Vulnerability to stress' by 'distorted roles' is extirpating the strong sex [i.e. male] as if by a disease. 20% of all men aged 20 to 24 are alcoholics, 80% of all drug addicts and 90% of all AIDS deaths are male. 75% of all men aged 45 to 54 are overweight. Twice as many men as women die of lung cancer. Three times as many wiped out by car accidents. Four times as many kill themselves. Soon they'll be extinct. Did anybody here say, 'a pity'?”

"Question: What does a woman do if she sees a man running zigzag through her garden? Answer: continue shooting!”

Popular Feminist Graffiti:

"Women have their faults / men have only two: / everything they say / everything they do."

The Houghton-Mifflin Reader's Companion to U.S. Women's History:

"Sexuality is not private, but is political and related to power. 'Compulsory heterosexuality' is part of a power structure benefiting heterosexual males at the expense of women and homosexuals. This inequity is justified by an ideology that sees heterosexuality as natural, universal and biologically necessary and homosexuality as the opposite. The system also is reinforced by legal sanctions and violence against women (rape, battering, incest, and murder) and against lesbians, gays, and transgendered persons (verbal harassment, physical assault and murder)."

A Feminist Dictionary, ed. Kramarae and Treichler, Pandora Press, 1985

"Man: ...an obsolete life form... an ordinary creature who needs to be watched... a contradictory baby-man..."

"Misandry: ...a refusal to suppress the evidence of one's experience with men... A woman's defense against fear and pain... An affirmation of the cathartic effects of justifiable anger."

"Strangers: Unknowns who, if male, are not to be trusted. Knowns are not to be trusted either."

"Testosterone Poisoning: ... Until now it has been thought that the level of testosterone in men is normal simply because they have it. But if you consider how abnormal their behavior is, then you are led to the hypothesis that almost all men are suffering from "testosterone poisoning."

My (Short) Speech on Feminism- and a Suggestion of Where all This is Going...

Hey girls: why not select a few of the statements above and substitute 'Jew' for 'men' or 'blacks' for 'men' and see how it sounds? Not too nice, hmm? Calling all blacks rapists or calling all Mexicans wife-beaters might qualify in most people's minds as FUCKING BIGOTRY, DOESN'T IT?!

It has been said: "Feminism is the radical notion that women are people." I think the above quotes indicate that feminism owes more to the idea that men are not people. Res ipsa loquiter: it speaks for itself that we're the official scapegoats of all humanity. They strip us of our humanity; we are characterized as nothing more than rape-machines or genetic mutants- we are nuisances or obstacles to be overcome or removed. When you dehumanize someone, it just makes them easier to hate. Perhaps EvilGuy's own anger and hate is a reaction to a popularized style of unjust hate-slinging that only women are allowed to commit? (According to Robin Morgan, EvilGuy's hatred is justifiable if it's a reaction to oppression. And since feminists feel that hating a given group is a form of oppression, then it stands to reason that man-hating is a form of oppression... so, EvilGuy's hate is perfectly justifiable and even laudable by those feminists' own standards.)

These are fairly extreme examples. I like to think that the Feminist Dictionary definitions are done in jest, but it's so hard to tell. (Especially that "testosterone poisoning" one; it's astounding that women who likely have no background in biochemistry can make ignorant sneers like that. You find it hard to take them seriously.) Ever get the distinct impression that most of these very dogmatic chicks seem to have a real problem with heterosexual contact of any type? But even more noteworthy is the daily flood of more subtle media bias that bombards us all constantly...

Consider this: "An overwhelming majority of British women believe a refrigerator is more useful than the man in their lives, according to a survey... A massive 87 per cent... reckoned their fridge was more indispensable than their partner..." -- "The Deccan Herald", October 16, 1997.

Or this quote from Anna Quindlen, the Pulitzer-prize winning author: "It's not that I don't like men; women are just better." Apparently, it's okay to say something like this in public- but it's not okay to say that men are 'just better' than women.

"Cosmopolitan" magazine has a feature entitled "Cosmo Confession" where women send-in confessions of their most heinous acts of revenge against those whom they've felt hurt by- almost always men. There is a thread of nastiness winding-through their confessions. Many women will express the most prejudicial and hateful sentiments about men without any shame, as though it were a sign of righteousness. This hatred has seeped into the thought and behavior of many more women than you can possibly believe. Average women echo these sentiments without ever thinking there's anything wrong with doing it- indeed, they don't even realize they're doing it! Maybe it wouldn't be quite so bad if most women didn't get so much empowering satisfaction from acting this way?? But they do- American women seem to like being bigots. They'll always ignore it; excuse it, trivialize it, or try to justify it. Whatever excuse you can dream-up, IT'S STILL BIGOTRY!

In the prologue to his book "Good Will Toward Men", Jack Kammer talks about the word misogyny, and its opposite, "misandry". He has an interesting explanation for why "misandry" is such a rare word (unlike "misogyny"). He says that misogyny is a crime that is socially unacceptable (in Western societies at least), whereas misandry is socially acceptable. In fact, misandry is compulsory among quite a few feminists. So, there is no need for a word to describe a state of mind that everyone is already in. Oh, women are always on high-alert for misogyny, but most don't know of the existence of the word 'misandry' because they think it's perfectly normal!

Oh sure- perhaps you could say some of the more extreme misandristic quotes on this page were taken out of context. Well, the only way these quotes could have possibly been taken-out of context is if every statement had been preceded with: "I've gotta be frigging nuts to say..." (And consider the sources: for anyone who has actually read her babble, you already know that Andrea Dworkin is completely fixated on rape, bordering on paranoid obsession. If a man so much as looks at her the wrong way, she'll call it 'rape'- and she's respected enough for her followers to influence the tabulation of phony rape statistics in a major way. And Catherine MacKinnon- well, she's the heroine who invented the legal concept of linking 'sexual harassment' to 'hostile work environment'. Marilyn French was an advisor to Al Gore's presidential campaign. So you can see what kind of profound impact they seem to have on our lives. Valerie Solanas however, she was a certifiably deranged wacko that feminists divorce themselves from. She shot and wounded Andy Warhol back in 1968 and later got herself institutionalized- she finally had the good sense to die in 1988. Nonetheless, the rambling, warped insanity of the 'SCUM Manifesto' can still be found floating around the I-net and in a few reading lists of some womens' studies courses, advocating its Final Solution: exterminating every male on the planet.)

They want you to believe that feminism today has inherited the mantle of the 19th century women's suffrage campaigns, which was a justifiable and reasoned social movement based on Enlightened thought of the day. The feminism of today was and always has been an elitist movement that has never concerned itself with the travails of lower-class women. Today's brand of feminism is obviously based on a set of virulently one-sided anti-male premises and not on the principles of the Enlightenment at all. It's clear they live in their own, angry self-contained worlds and see the planet strictly in terms of men being powerful bastards and women being brutalized angels. If someone or something won't dance to their tune, they use the Doublespeak label of 'oppression'. No one ever calls them bigots because man-hating isn't considered to be a bad thing. Heterosexual men are the only group on the planet that people are officially 'allowed' to hate- doesn't cultivating hate of any human group amount to reprehensible behavior? But nay, they flaunt it like it's a virtue.

And who ever said that feminists were reasonable? Half of them are convinced that men invented logic as a trick to win arguments, for God's sake! Oh, sure- you also might say that these are all 'bad feminists', and I should not group them with the 'good feminists' who oppose them. (Just where are all these 'good feminists', anyway?) Well, if that's true- that the main accomplishments of the 'good feminists' are to oppose the excessive harm of the 'bad feminists,' then wouldn't society be better-off without feminists altogether?! There, I said it!

And consider what has to be the most ludicrous, self-contradictory aspect of the entire movement: some radical feminists advocate altering the English language so that 'fireman' becomes the gender-neutral 'fireperson' or 'waiter/waitress' becomes the genderless 'waitron'. Okay, that in itself is kind of silly, but here's the BIG kicker: elements of the movement are concerned with removing gender forms from the English language... except for changing the name of their own damn movement! Shouldn't the word 'feminism' be gender-neutral too? How are we supposed to swallow that it represents the interests of both genders when the name of their movement only represents one gender on a basic conceptual level? I mean, come on! It advocates the female point of view, desires, and interests- regardless of whether or not it runs-over that nameless, 'other' gender in the process.

The 'good feminists' only serve to push-back on the 'bad feminists', and never with total success- critiques of feminism are rarely published, discouraged and often squashed, as is demonstrated by a small collection of testimony at the end of those links. Or consider this sample: testimony of a male professor who tried to design a course about men's lives. He says: "In 2000, Canadian universities listed two courses on men, neither taught that year, and more than 1,617 feminist courses, offered in programs from undergraduate to PhD degrees." Feminists don't approve of a diversity of ideas, only their own dogma. The 'bad feminists' see themselves as above criticism; unfalsifiable.

There are certain groups of women who desperately want to hate men and who love to hate men-- even to the point of fabricating stuff to help spread the hate. The people who said the quotes above are obviously irrational, deluded, unreasonable and hateful- but alternate views are rarely presented with any purposefulness. The two dozen quotes you read above basically deny the existence of virtuous male behavior, you can't reduce it any father than that. And those people are pushing a fairly successful political agenda based on it all, to boot. An agenda where women can have their cake and eat it, too- and where men are to blame for anything that can possibly be dreamt-up. Misandry isn't an expression of righteous anger, it's an expression of prejudice. An expression of bigotry.

Bigotry is born as a result of ignorance, fear and an inability to understand alternate perspectives. Once a person has built their career on bigotry, you can't cure them any more than you can cure a corpse. All you can do is expose them for what they are, and hope that enough women are perceptive enough to just ignore them. But, the 'bad feminists' are the ones who have been driving the whole movement since the early 1970s because they've been the ones who have been controlling the agenda and pushing the 'good feminists' around. They are the ones who are on the offensive all the time, therefore only they are gaining any ground.

How did this happen? It's simple: all of the most reasonable feminist goals were met long ago. So now, the main thrust of the extremists is to reach as many unreasonable goals as possible before any significant opposition is able to develop. And now people are only starting to wake-up to this.

Every ideology talks long about its good intentions- but the road to hell is paved with good intentions.
The promise of a socialist utopia was hijacked by the Bolsheviks, for instance. They took power as part of a coalition of groups which intended to build Socialism in one form or another. But as soon as they consolidated power in Russia in early 1921, the Bolsheviks then moved-along their own radical path. The Bolsheviks began to attack every remaining group which didn't agree with their view of the future: the clergy, the Mensheviks, the Social-Revolutionary Party, the Social-Democratic Party, workers' unions. As the Bolsheviks publicly tried and secretly executed thousands of opponents, they claimed all throughout the process that any dissent was a 'backlash' against the noble cause of 'socialism'. After they reached a critical lack of opposition, they were free to turn the entire country into a hell on earth- and they called it 'Socialism'. The Soviet system was so dangerous because they swore that everything they did was because of their good intentions. The Bolsheviks hid their cold indifference to human life behind a mask of benevolence while murdering huge numbers of people. And many people around the world were totally suckered by the mask.

Feminism has its own good intentions: it's all about the noble cause of 'Equality'. 'Equality', being Doublespeak for something quite different. (We already know that they flip back and forth between 'equal rights' and 'special rights'. And we know that they create new double-standards wherever it's convenient.) But what is the big picture that emerges? What are they doing exactly?

Dr. Daphne Patai, (a professor of literature at the University of Massachusetts and author of the book "Heterophobia") said in an address in September, 1999: "I'm aware that there are many feminists and many feminisms. However, there is also an identifiable trend within feminism of antagonism toward men and male heterosexuality above all. There is a fear of heterosexuality, male heterosexuality in particular, and sometimes the heterosexuality of other women...
"I conclude from all of this, that there is antagonism to heterosexuality within the women's movement. Now, this isn't news. It's just that feminists have spent so much time pretending this isn't true and insisting that the accusations against them of "male bashing" was just backlash against feminists...
"They claim it's a misrepresentation of feminism, but it's not a misrepresentation. As someone who spent 10 years in women's studies, I know that male-bashing has always been a very important part of feminism... The language used by feminist extremists has become so ubiquitous that it is very difficult for reasonable people to frame arguments in something other than that language... The real aim is to change the relations between men and women in a fundamental way.
"Why? Who benefits from this? The only people are those radical extremists who want to disrupt male and female interactions, and they have done just that..."

In the simplest terms: feminism is an ideology that pretends to represent what is best for humanity, while it covertly carries-out the destructiveness of those who desire revenge against the groups they hate and fear. For years, I always wanted to think that the women's movement was, at its core, striving for the better of humanity. But now I know better- that's just a deception. Naturally, they'll deny it- they have to deny it or it wouldn't be a very good deception, would it? And most women in society... sadly, they are seen as pawns in the game. They are seduced by an ideology which preaches to their stereotypes and anger.

Gladden Schrock, in "The Tyranny of the Underdog", says: "What we are seeing in this headless misandry is a grand display of the Tyranny of the Underdog: 'I am a wretchedly longstanding victim; therefore I own no burden of adult accountability, nor need to honor any restraint against my words and actions. In fact, all efforts to restrain me are only further proof of my oppressed condition.'
"It is the most perfect trump-card against accountable living ever devised."

As the list of aforementioned quotes illustrate, behind feminism's noble claim to represent equality is hate, toxicity and bigotry and the desire to blast-apart the male-female bond. Like attacking the pillars of a bridge with TNT.

It is sick, it is hate-mongering, it is pathological. It's one of the reasons I left the U.S. And it's one of the reasons Dr. Patai wishes to expose the extremists of the women's movement.

Sadly, too many women in the U.S. don't seem to have her level of perception. God help us all.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Man-hating is everywhere, but everywhere it is twisted and transformed, disguised, tranquilized, and qualified. It coexists, never peacefully, with the love, desire, respect, and need women also feel for men. Always man-hating is shadowed by its milder, more diplomatic and doubtful twin, ambivalence." -- Judith Levine

Back to Home